So, I do enjoy reading this blog on occasion called Pub Rants, from the point of view of an agent who has some bestselling author clients. She's very blunt and to the point about trends in publishing and what she/editors want and don't want. Anyway, I spent like 2 hours reading through the blog last night, because I hadn't really looked at it in a few years. To tell you the truth, usually reading these kinds of sites makes me a bit twitchy and uncomfortable, but yet I can't turn away.
For example, she makes all these lists of things that editors roll their eyes at as far as plot points in fantasy stories.
One of the reasons listed for why a SF&F book will get rejected at the query level is this:
Reason 2: SF&F stereotypical archetypes as the “hook”
--the mysterious object
--the unexpected birthright
--the quest
--the villain that has risen again
--exiled to another planet
--mayhem on spaceship to new planet
--Androids with heart of gold
--The main character as the key to saving the world or species
--the just discovered talisman
Um....isn't that not so much stereotypical archetype but Hero of a Thousand Faces archetype? What about that whole there are no new plots in the world? Isn't that what a lot of fantasy readers who fell in love with LOTR and Harry Potter and all its imitation fic really want? I know I am a SUCKER for a great quest story with mysterious objects and the main character who is sort of vulnerable needing to save the world plot device. I could read that scenario over and over. Now what's true is that there is a lot of poorly written crap that uses the above scenarios, both published and not. I would imagine that editors keep seeing the same soulless crap. AND this pubrants agent is also very quick to point out that ALL OF THE ABOVE would be accepted and sold if the story blew them away. For young adult novels, editors are rolling their eyes and rejecting stuff left and right because the market for vampires, zombies, werewolves, angels, and especially paranormal romance etc. is so over-saturated. Dystopian stories as well.
HOWEVER, at the same time these same editors acknowledge that teenagers (and middle-aged women, haha) are still buying these paranormal romance books like crazy. So if they KNOW that these plots are still selling like hotcakes, why on earth should their own weariness of seeing it stop them from publishing the ones that are decent (if not that original)? Most people, if they have a kink or plot point interest, are insatiable (like me with a good vulnerable main character and quest and mysterious object plot). AND don't all of us who read fan fic read and reread the same scenarios over and over again, as long as it hits our particular kinks? (like in LOTR -- fluff, mpreg, slave fic, Frood in trouble, Frodo/Sam romance, hurt/comfort, healing in the Undying Lands). And wouldn't you agree that if the fic hits your kink in the right way, that it doesn't have to be particularly brilliant as far as the writing goes? Now for me to read a kink/scenario/pairing I'm not as interested in, the writing needs to blow me away. That's a different issue. But if there's purple prose or a few annoying things in a fic that hits my kinks, I'm willing to look past it. Anyway, I've heard people say, "NO YOU CAN'T USE THAT MANY ADJECTIVES OMG BAD" or "NO PASSIVE VOICE EVER!!!" or whatever other things we learned in English grammar/writing class in high school/college about what is "bad writing" -- but then those same people might read Twilight and love it just because the story itself satisfies something in them.
Now I'm hearing whispers of this Fifty Shades of Gray, which this Pubrants person mentions on the first entry that you can see when you click on the link. I know NOTHING about it aside from it's supposed to be erotic and the book club ladies are eating it up. Have any of you read it? Someone on my flist posted a rant about it, how she's read way better fan fic erotica than that. Somehow I think that most of us here would agree with that. Anyway, apparently it's an example of writing that isn't that great hitting a particular kink that appeals to a lot of people and thus being wildly successful. And yes, the more you try to ban it from libraries, the more appealing it gets to people, I would think.
Anyway, this whole thing of seeing lists of plot trends on the way out and trends on the way in always puts me into a tiny bit of a tailspin because it's often stuff that I like or would like to write or am writing on the way out or oversaturated. Yes, of course I know you're not supposed to pay attention to trends and just write from your heart. So whatever, I'm not really worried about it. But it's still discouraging to hear that dystopian is on the way out, when I happen to enjoy that genre. I still want some more to be published so I can be blown away. Hunger Games ALMOST did that for me, but just not quite. I don't want the editors to stop publishing a certain trend just because they're bored with it.
Things I would want to read/write:
Modern day quest with mysterious object, mysterious birthright, vulnerable main character who must save the world (HEY, I did mention I'm insatiable with this plot, yes?)
A really awesome mermaid story
Horror but not with the gore, more just creepy and building in terror and somehow related to international travel, ala The Ruins by Scott Smith
Dystopian done really well.
Sorry, this was a bit of a disorganized ramble. Any thoughts to add?
For example, she makes all these lists of things that editors roll their eyes at as far as plot points in fantasy stories.
One of the reasons listed for why a SF&F book will get rejected at the query level is this:
Reason 2: SF&F stereotypical archetypes as the “hook”
--the mysterious object
--the unexpected birthright
--the quest
--the villain that has risen again
--exiled to another planet
--mayhem on spaceship to new planet
--Androids with heart of gold
--The main character as the key to saving the world or species
--the just discovered talisman
Um....isn't that not so much stereotypical archetype but Hero of a Thousand Faces archetype? What about that whole there are no new plots in the world? Isn't that what a lot of fantasy readers who fell in love with LOTR and Harry Potter and all its imitation fic really want? I know I am a SUCKER for a great quest story with mysterious objects and the main character who is sort of vulnerable needing to save the world plot device. I could read that scenario over and over. Now what's true is that there is a lot of poorly written crap that uses the above scenarios, both published and not. I would imagine that editors keep seeing the same soulless crap. AND this pubrants agent is also very quick to point out that ALL OF THE ABOVE would be accepted and sold if the story blew them away. For young adult novels, editors are rolling their eyes and rejecting stuff left and right because the market for vampires, zombies, werewolves, angels, and especially paranormal romance etc. is so over-saturated. Dystopian stories as well.
HOWEVER, at the same time these same editors acknowledge that teenagers (and middle-aged women, haha) are still buying these paranormal romance books like crazy. So if they KNOW that these plots are still selling like hotcakes, why on earth should their own weariness of seeing it stop them from publishing the ones that are decent (if not that original)? Most people, if they have a kink or plot point interest, are insatiable (like me with a good vulnerable main character and quest and mysterious object plot). AND don't all of us who read fan fic read and reread the same scenarios over and over again, as long as it hits our particular kinks? (like in LOTR -- fluff, mpreg, slave fic, Frood in trouble, Frodo/Sam romance, hurt/comfort, healing in the Undying Lands). And wouldn't you agree that if the fic hits your kink in the right way, that it doesn't have to be particularly brilliant as far as the writing goes? Now for me to read a kink/scenario/pairing I'm not as interested in, the writing needs to blow me away. That's a different issue. But if there's purple prose or a few annoying things in a fic that hits my kinks, I'm willing to look past it. Anyway, I've heard people say, "NO YOU CAN'T USE THAT MANY ADJECTIVES OMG BAD" or "NO PASSIVE VOICE EVER!!!" or whatever other things we learned in English grammar/writing class in high school/college about what is "bad writing" -- but then those same people might read Twilight and love it just because the story itself satisfies something in them.
Now I'm hearing whispers of this Fifty Shades of Gray, which this Pubrants person mentions on the first entry that you can see when you click on the link. I know NOTHING about it aside from it's supposed to be erotic and the book club ladies are eating it up. Have any of you read it? Someone on my flist posted a rant about it, how she's read way better fan fic erotica than that. Somehow I think that most of us here would agree with that. Anyway, apparently it's an example of writing that isn't that great hitting a particular kink that appeals to a lot of people and thus being wildly successful. And yes, the more you try to ban it from libraries, the more appealing it gets to people, I would think.
Anyway, this whole thing of seeing lists of plot trends on the way out and trends on the way in always puts me into a tiny bit of a tailspin because it's often stuff that I like or would like to write or am writing on the way out or oversaturated. Yes, of course I know you're not supposed to pay attention to trends and just write from your heart. So whatever, I'm not really worried about it. But it's still discouraging to hear that dystopian is on the way out, when I happen to enjoy that genre. I still want some more to be published so I can be blown away. Hunger Games ALMOST did that for me, but just not quite. I don't want the editors to stop publishing a certain trend just because they're bored with it.
Things I would want to read/write:
Modern day quest with mysterious object, mysterious birthright, vulnerable main character who must save the world (HEY, I did mention I'm insatiable with this plot, yes?)
A really awesome mermaid story
Horror but not with the gore, more just creepy and building in terror and somehow related to international travel, ala The Ruins by Scott Smith
Dystopian done really well.
Sorry, this was a bit of a disorganized ramble. Any thoughts to add?
no subject
Date: 2012-05-13 01:58 pm (UTC)IDK, not really what I'm into but I say if people are enjoying a super erotic kinky story and the author's making a bundle with it more power to them!
no subject
Date: 2012-05-13 02:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-13 02:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-13 02:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-13 03:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-13 03:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-13 03:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-13 03:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-13 03:36 pm (UTC)I think that's a good point as to why fan fic writers don't like this bringing fan fic more mainstream. I can see that. I sort of feel that. Sort of like, hey this is MY private realm. Don't make it Hollywood! But I don't feel that emotionally attached one way or the other...
no subject
Date: 2012-05-13 03:19 pm (UTC)Tolkien wrote The Lord of the Rings because his publisher asked for a sequel to The Hobbit. But it was not at all the sort of "sequel" that Stanley Unwin was expecting. Yet he was patient with JRRT, allowing him to take his time through many false starts and in spite of the fact that it was (a) not a children's book and (b)full of things that no one had done before in quite that way while (c) including six of the eight things that the person above says are "bad". And it turned out to be the most influential book of the Twentieth Century.
Archetypes and tropes DO push people's buttons. Otherwise said archetypes and tropes would not become archetypes and tropes to begin with. They are what people WANT to read/watch.
And that's why the staples of fanfic, such as hurt/comfort and fluff and angst draw people in, even though they already know how the main story, the source story, plays out.
Agents and publishers need to get a clue.
That is, of course, if they want authors to continue to use their services-- what they provide is increasingly less relevant to writers who now have many other options for getting their stories "out there".
no subject
Date: 2012-05-13 03:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-13 04:54 pm (UTC)I've always thought of fanfiction and escapism literature as "candy." Tastes good and is amusing (and occasionally reaches greater heights) but too much of it is not good. When I was younger, mystery novels were my "candy" reading. Now it's fanfiction (right now, Sherlock gen fic with Watson as the central character), and I probably read more than is good for me (rather than reading more mind-expanding literature), even though I love that I can find many stories that cater to my favorite plotlines and it's easy, quick gratification.
I personally am kind of taken aback by how many adults are reading YA novels and such. I get the feeling that is all some of the adults are reading. I feel like a luddite in saying this, but it seems as though "good" literature is taking too much of a backburner to the easy-to-digest-escapism stuff. I'm only concerned because publishers want to make money, after all, and I would hate to see quality literature crowded out of the market entirely.
no subject
Date: 2012-05-13 11:45 pm (UTC)I was once taken aback by the adults reading young adult novels myself, but I know several people who do. I very much respect people who read for escapism. I know I do, especially during the school year when I just don't want to think that hard while doing something "for pleasure." I figure, at least, that it's a step above watching the latest reality show (er...guilty of that, too!) And yes, it's great to expand our minds via real literature once in awhile (and yes, I think there will always be a market for that, since in fact it is so rare), but that's not where the biggest market is. I believe I read somewhere that literary fiction writers probably get the least advance for selling their work.
no subject
Date: 2012-05-15 12:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-16 10:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-13 08:27 pm (UTC)I think people should read and write whatever the hell they want. Seriously. Stuff like this drives me so crazy now that I don't usually read it. I don't mind learning from real writers for some of my more "literary" stuff and am thinking of going litmag subs on some of my short things like flashfic and poetry...but that's writers, not agents whining and bitching. Man.
Sorry for ranting. Just...can you tell this is a very sore spot with me? ;)
Hugs,
Febobe :)
no subject
Date: 2012-05-13 11:47 pm (UTC)I 100 percent agree that people should read and write what they want. We only have so many days/hours on this earth and why waste it doing stuff you don't really love?
**hugs**
no subject
Date: 2012-05-13 08:47 pm (UTC)Delight in the paranormal WILL NEVER GO AWAY so I'm going to write what I want and not sweat what 'the industry' is bleating about.
no subject
Date: 2012-05-13 11:48 pm (UTC)